Friday, April 19, 2002,
12:00 a.m. Pacific
South downtown pays for beat cops
By Alex Fryer
Seattle Times staff reporter
An association representing Pioneer
Square and the Chinatown International District has signed a first-of-its-kind
deal with the Seattle Police Department to pay for two full-time beat cops
devoted exclusively to their neighborhoods.
The two-year, $325,000 contract completed yesterday illustrates the desire
of business districts across the city for old-style community policing, an
approach to crime that is more Mayberry and less Gotham City.
A Broadway merchant group is working on a similar plan. In about a year,
boosters hope to assess Capitol Hill property owners roughly $2,300 to pay for
a pair of Seattle patrol officers to walk the neighborhood.
Though foot and bike patrols cannot prevent random crimes such as the death
of 33-year-old Demetri Andrews, who died Friday after a confrontation on
University Way Northeast, business associations say beat cops make life tough
for the bad guys while ensuring shoppers and residents that help is nearby.
"It's better community policing. It's the same people every day," said Todd
Graham, executive director of the South Downtown Foundation, which represents
residents and merchants in Pioneer Square, the Chinatown International
District and an area south of Safeco Field known as North Duwamish. "You'd
think it'd be a no-brainer."
Police officials say they often assign officers to walk beats in
neighborhoods. But responding to 911 calls takes priority, and foot patrols
are often redeployed for emergencies.
"Our primary deployment is based on 911 calls and public-safety
requirements," Deputy Chief Clark Kimerer said. "The needs (of business
districts) will have to take a back seat compared to who needs help and how
fast do we need to be there to help them."
The South Downtown Foundation was formed in 1999 as a way to address the
impact of the new football stadium. The foundation manages $6 million
contributed by Paul Allen's First & Goal, which manages stadium construction.
A public-safety study commissioned by the foundation heard complaints from
residents and property owners about inadequate police visibility and long
response times to emergency calls. The study also noted that business
officials in the area didn't want to pay extra for neighborhood security.
Nonetheless, the foundation signed a contract with the city that will pay
for two uniformed police officers to work in the neighborhoods.
The South Downtown officers will report to the West Precinct and respond to
emergencies if needed. They will not respond to routine 911 calls, however,
focusing instead on walking the neighborhood and solving chronic problems such
as drug dealing and aggressive panhandling.
The contract specifies that the department will not reduce the current
level of police staffing in the sector.
"There will be a heavy emphasis on community policing. They will really get
to know the business people and residents in the area," said
Mike Brasfield, a former Seattle assistant
chief who now advises the South Downtown Foundation.
The department estimates that the salary and benefits of each officer will
amount to $72,439 annually. The foundation will reimburse the department for
the salaries, as well as accounting, record-keeping and vehicle costs. The
department will pay for equipment such as service weapons, handcuffs and
vests.
"It's new ground for Seattle," said Assistant Chief Jim Pugel. He said the
officers would be absorbed into the department and reassigned after the
contract expires, unless the foundation or another neighborhood group renews
the deal.
Pugel said the department was amenable to the South Downtown Foundation
contract because Pioneer Square is one of highest-crime areas in the city. He
said future contracts would also be limited to neighborhoods with significant
public-safety issues.
Business groups on Broadway are watching the South Downtown experiment
carefully.
Although the East Precinct has a five-officer bike team that patrols
Capitol Hill and the Central Area, local merchants want police to walk along
Broadway, said Barry Rogel, owner of the Deluxe Bar and Grill and president of
the Capitol Hill Safety Coalition.
Twenty years ago, beat cops routinely strolled through the area, he said.
Now, police are stretched thin, and locals are worried that greater numbers of
street youth and chronic inebriates are starting to affect business.
"If there is a perception of public safety (problems), you lose foot
traffic. If you lose foot traffic, I go out of business," Rogel said.
The Broadway Business Improvement Area, which represents about 250
merchants, is considering expanding its boundaries and assessing property
owners to raise about $1 million, in part, to subsidize two officers to
exclusively work Broadway.
"Public safety is our Number 1 issue," Rogel said. "Are we thrilled to
self-assess ourselves to do it? No, but I have to do this to make my customers
feel safe."
Monica Moe, executive director of the Broadway Business Improvement Area,
added: "We want to do something now so we don't degenerate to the level of The
Ave."
Teresa Lord Hugel, executive director of the Greater University Chamber of
Commerce, said she started her job in September and quickly noticed a pall
over the neighborhood. Drug dealing was rampant. Street kids hassled
passers-by.
"There seemed to be some energy around that the streets were fair game,"
she said. "When I started seeing open drug activity, I was getting pretty
distressed."
The chamber had funds to pay off-duty patrol officers to walk University
Way Northeast, known as "The Ave," about 80 hours a month, but it wasn't
enough. Lord Hugel began pestering her local precinct for added patrols, and
in February, the precinct responded.
Three officers now walk The Ave, said Lt. Steven Paulsen, watch commander
at the North Precinct. He'd like to add a fourth.
"The biggest benefit in having a foot patrol is it brings the officers
closer to the citizens," said Paulsen. "You're not shielded by a patrol car.
It allows officers to really know what's going on in their area."
But the officers are not part of a dedicated foot patrol, so they must
respond to 911 calls. And police officials are watching the officers'
productivity. If crime starts to dip on The Ave, the cops will stay on foot.
If the situation remains stagnant, or response time to emergency calls climbs,
they will be reassigned to cars, Kimerer said.
The department must constantly balance the needs of a business district
with the community at large, he said. That tug of war may prompt more areas to
consider paying for their own protection.
"The Police Department has an obligation for general protection, not
specific protection," Kimerer said. "Not a specific person, not a specific
community. We are obligated to provide public safety to everyone."
Alex Fryer can be reached at 206-464-8124 or
afryer@seattletimes.com.
Surveillance planned for Pioneer Square
Group sees a crime deterrent, but others say the plan
smacks of Big Brother
Tuesday, August 20, 2002
By PHUONG CAT LE
SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER REPORTER
The next time you wander through parts of Pioneer Square, electronic eyes
may be watching and recording your every move.
The Pioneer Square Community Association plans to install three
closed-circuit television cameras, or CCTVs, to monitor public areas as a way
to prevent crime and make neighbors feel safer.
With a $20,000 grant for a one-year pilot project, the neighborhood group
said it'll likely mount fixed cameras on private property to view parts of
Occidental Park and the Yesler Way corridor near Third Avenue.
Video surveillance of public places is on the rise nationwide, and common
in parts of Europe, renewing the debate about privacy rights. Everett,
Tukwila, New York City and much of Great Britain now use CCTVs to watch
subways, sidewalks, streets and stadiums.
The Pioneer Square project will be run by a community group, not a city
agency.
"It's certainly not a panacea by any means," said Casey Jones, the
association's executive director. "We hope to send a message that this place
is cared for and there's an expectation that here in this public place you
won't conduct illegal activity."
Civil rights activists say the idea smacks of George Orwell's "1984," the
novel in which Big Brother uses cameras to monitor citizens' movements.
"The idea of being watched all the time makes me uncomfortable as a woman,"
said Susan Tillitt, an artist who lives in Pioneer Square.
"Cameras everywhere is a form of harassment in general. You don't spy on me
for my safety. It's a creepy feeling, because you don't know who's watching
you."
Lavale Smith, a homeless man who spends his day at the city park near Third
Avenue and Yesler Way, said: "It's an invasion of privacy. Why here? That's
wrong."
Doug Honig, public education director with the American Civil Liberties
Union of Washington, speaking generally about video cameras, questioned how
video cameras would be used: "Who has access to these tapes? How long are they
stored? What's done with it?
"The overwhelming material they capture is legal conduct by law-abiding
citizens. It's usually done for a benign reason. As we get more and more of
these cameras, people get more used to them. Down the road, it moves us closer
to Big-Brother-is-watching scenario."
Yesterday, Sunny Nguyen said he favored the idea because he thought it
would help reduce crime.
"There will be more security around here," said Nguyen, who recently
witnessed an assault at night. "I'm not worried about privacy. We're in a
public place."
Once installed, within the next two or three months, the Pioneer Square
cameras will capture digital footage that would be kept for "a short time,"
said Jones, who didn't know how long that would be. "We're not storing months
and months worth of footage to try to use it in some way."
The group hasn't signed a contract or worked out other details, such as who
will get access to the footage, but ideally police could request it, Jones
said.
CCTVs have become increasing popular with law enforcement. In a 2001
report, the International Association of Police Chiefs found that 700 agencies
use the cameras, mostly to help with investigations or gather evidence.
"It's no different than you or I standing on a street corner with a 35
millimeter camera taking pictures," said Mike
Brasfield, former Seattle assistant police chief and a public
safety coordinator with the South Downtown Foundation.
The foundation, formed in 1999 to distribute mitigation money from the new
football stadium and exhibition center, provided $20,000 grants to three
neighborhoods for cameras.
Within days, the Sodo Business Association plans to mount two video cameras
onto private buildings to nail graffiti artists who've been tagging buildings
in that south downtown neighborhood.
"The city does the best it can but it can't keep up with the public
graffiti," said Mike Peringer, the group's president. "We are taking it upon
ourselves to do something about it."
He declined to say where the cameras would be mounted, but that it would be
on private property and would likely move. Inevitably it would trained on some
public sidewalks and streets.
The cameras can zero in to read a license plate on a van and be monitored
in real time by the company providing the equipment, Seattle Video, he said.
While Sodo and Pioneer Square move forward, the Chinatown/International
District decided recently not to accept the grant because of concerns with
operations, costs and the vendor.
Neighbors in the district also wrestled with issues of privacy, including
the possibility that cameras create a false sense of safety for people. They
ultimately will not accept the $20,000 grant, but still like the idea.
"We hope that we'll be able to use it in case crimes do happen," said Sue
Taoka, executive director of the Chinatown/International District Public
Development Authority. "If it becomes some level of deterrent, it creates a
safer neighborhood overall."
Some proponents point out that people's public lives are already being
watched.
More than 200 traffic cameras watch major freeways around greater Seattle.
Cameras track car prowlers in Community Transit park-and-ride lots and watch
over children in school playgrounds and lunchrooms.
King County Metro is in the process of installing camera systems aboard 160
buses and plans to add more.
"It's to make people feel safe, not just to catch bad guys," said Linda
Thielke, Metro spokeswoman.
Four fixed cameras on 40-foot buses and five cameras on 60-foot buses
broadcast real-time to a viewing station at Metro headquarters. Only transit
police can get access to the recording, and so far they've done so only when a
driver files an incident report, Thielke said. Tukwila police zero in on
criminal activity along one of the worst sections of Pacific Highway South
with video cameras.
In Everett, five cameras mounted on lamp posts at downtown intersections
transmit images to a viewing room at the police station. Officers can pop a
videotape into the player and record, but they don't automatically do so. Any
long-term recordings require supervisor approval.
"It didn't cure the crime problem, it just added another tool for the
police to use," said Lt. Marty Parker, who started the camera project five
years ago after the downtown business association requested it. "With six
cameras, officer can watch a multitude of areas."
Parker once observed a vicious juvenile assault in the viewing room and
radioed a patrol officer to the scene. The suspect fled at the sound of
approaching sirens, but Parker tracked the man with the pan-tilt-zoom cameras
as he fled for three blocks.
Yet in Great Britain, where news reports estimate more than 1 million
cameras patrol the cities and towns, two major studies of CCTV use have shown
that they haven't clearly reduced crime. A report in June by the National
Association for the Care and Resettlement of Offenders found that of 24
English cities studied, 13 showed that crime had fallen since CCTV cameras
were installed. In four, crime rose significantly, and in the other seven
cities, cameras had no effect.
P-I reporter Phuong Cat Le can be reached at 206-903-0370 or
phuongle@seattlepi.com